Vithiya d/o Rajendra

Vithiya d/o Rajendra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and anti-suit injunction. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in estoppel and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Estoppel	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bonds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya d/o Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vithiya d/o Rajendra has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Ang Kian Tiong v DBS Bank Ltd: Dispute over Capitalised Interest on Convertible Bonds(Nov 2024) Baker v BCS Business Consulting: Account of Trust Assets & Ethocyn Rights(Dec 2021) Baker v BCS: Anti-Suit Injunction Granted in Ethocyn Rights Trust Dispute(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vithiya d/o Rajendra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vithiya d/o Rajendra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	23,578,272.69	23,578,272.691 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Kian Tiong v DBS Bank Ltd: Dispute over Capitalised Interest on Convertible Bonds 12 Nov 2024 DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Nov 2024	DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedThe claimant's application was dismissed.
2	Baker v BCS Business Consulting: Account of Trust Assets & Ethocyn Rights 26 Dec 2021 Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant)Partial	26 Dec 2021	Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant): Partial Judgment against DefendantOrder for Defendant to pay US$7,859,424.23 plus CHF1,662,894.67. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) for the original claim. However, the judgment specifies USD and CHF for the amounts to be paid.
3	Baker v BCS: Anti-Suit Injunction Granted in Ethocyn Rights Trust Dispute 18 Nov 2021 Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant)Partial	18 Nov 2021	Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant): Anti-suit injunction granted in partAnti-suit injunction granted in part, restraining the defendants from relitigating the existence, validity, and enforceability of a trust over Ethocyn rights, but allowing them to pursue claims related to Baker's alleged misrepresentation and the settlement agreement with Nu Skin.
4	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Negligence, Duty of Care & Banking 24 Mar 2019 Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2019	Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.