Vithiya Rajendra

Vithiya Rajendra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and enforcement of foreign judgments. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Vithiya Rajendra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vithiya Rajendra has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Guanghua SS Holdings Ltd v Lim Yew Cheng: Setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment & Substituted Service(Jun 2023) Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights(Apr 2020)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Maintenance and Division of Matrimonial Assets(Aug 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vithiya Rajendra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.8 parties avg	3.8	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vithiya Rajendra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CHF	9,500,000.00	9,500,000.001 cases	1
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Guanghua SS Holdings Ltd v Lim Yew Cheng: Setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment & Substituted Service 14 Jun 2023 Lim Yew Cheng (Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2023	Lim Yew Cheng (Defendant): Application dismissedD1's application to set aside the Registration Order and the Substituted Service Order was dismissed.
2	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights 28 Apr 2020 Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2020	Renslade Holdings Limited (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the Defendant's arguments and found in favor of the Plaintiff.
3	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Maintenance and Division of Matrimonial Assets 25 Aug 2014 AYL (Respondent)Partial	25 Aug 2014	AYL (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Judge’s order for maintenance was reduced so that the Husband is to pay a lump sum of $100,000 by way of lump sum maintenance for her. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.