Vivien Teng

Vivien Teng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and chancery and equity. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vivien Teng has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rule against bias	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Association Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vivien Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vivien Teng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah and Tann	4 cases	80% of cases	IW v IX: Appeal for Child Custody - Principles for Granting Leave to Appeal(Oct 2005) OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction(Mar 2005) Black and Veatch v Jurong Engineering: Applicability of SIAC Arbitration Rules(Jul 2004)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	20% of cases	Kanesananthan v Singapore Ceylon Tamils' Association: Validity of Amended Constitution and Disciplinary Proceedings(Apr 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vivien Teng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vivien Teng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IW v IX: Appeal for Child Custody - Principles for Granting Leave to Appeal 12 Oct 2005 IX (Respondent)Won	12 Oct 2005	IX (Respondent): Appeal upheldThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion for leave to appeal.
2	OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction 29 Mar 2005 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2005	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for delivery of possession of the property, sale of the property, and repayment of loans with contractual interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Black and Veatch v Jurong Engineering: Applicability of SIAC Arbitration Rules 07 Jul 2004 Black and Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	07 Jul 2004	Black and Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Jurong Engineering v Black & Veatch: Dispute Over SIAC Arbitration Rules Applicability 25 Nov 2003 Black & Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2003	Black & Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ application allowed with costs, therefore the defendant lost the application and had to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Kanesananthan v Singapore Ceylon Tamils' Association: Validity of Amended Constitution and Disciplinary Proceedings 14 Apr 2003 Singapore Ceylon Tamils' Association (Defendant)Won	14 Apr 2003	Singapore Ceylon Tamils' Association (Defendant): Application DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application to nullify its constitution and restrain disciplinary proceedings. The plaintiff must bear the costs of the ex parte application and the defendant's application to discharge it.