Viviene Kaur Sandhu

Viviene Kaur Sandhu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and damages assessment. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Actuarial Tables	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Exaggerated Claims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance Claims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Viviene Kaur Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Viviene Kaur Sandhu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Clifford Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Muhammad Adam Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean: Damages for Personal Injuries(Dec 2021) Tan Poh Weng Andy v Lee Jee: Referral to Attorney-General Due to Multiple Accidents and Potential Claim Exaggeration(Nov 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Viviene Kaur Sandhu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Viviene Kaur Sandhu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,186,182.40	2,186,182.401 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Adam Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean: Damages for Personal Injuries 22 Dec 2021 Muhammad Adam Lee bin Muhammad Lee (Plaintiff)Won	22 Dec 2021	Muhammad Adam Lee bin Muhammad Lee (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $2,186,182.40 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Poh Weng Andy v Lee Jee: Referral to Attorney-General Due to Multiple Accidents and Potential Claim Exaggeration 06 Nov 2013 Tan Poh Weng Andy (Plaintiff)Neutral	06 Nov 2013	Tan Poh Weng Andy (Plaintiff): Settlement Not ApprovedThe court declined to record the settlement and referred the case to the Attorney-General for investigation.