VK Rajah

VK Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

VK Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VK Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

VK Rajah has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	2 cases	67% of cases	WSG Nimbus v Board of Control for Cricket: International Arbitration, Anti-Suit Injunction, and Issue Estoppel(May 2002) Christina Au v Adela Lo: Adverse Possession & Land Boundary Dispute(Oct 2001)
Rajan & Tann	1 cases	33% of cases	ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd: Setting Aside Interim Arbitral Award - Amending Originating Motion(May 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of VK Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of VK Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd: Setting Aside Interim Arbitral Award - Amending Originating Motion 07 May 2003 ABC Co (Applicant)Partial	07 May 2003	ABC Co (Applicant): Application to amend originating motion partially allowedLeave was granted to add one new ground, but the application was dismissed for all other proposed amendments (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	WSG Nimbus v Board of Control for Cricket: International Arbitration, Anti-Suit Injunction, and Issue Estoppel 12 May 2002 WSG Nimbus Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	12 May 2002	WSG Nimbus Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to set aside anti-suit injunction dismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's application to set aside the anti-suit injunction.
3	Christina Au v Adela Lo: Adverse Possession & Land Boundary Dispute 15 Oct 2001 Adela Lo Sook Ling (Defendant)Lost	15 Oct 2001	Adela Lo Sook Ling (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the defendant; the defendant must deliver vacant possession of the disputed land, pay damages for wrongful trespass to be assessed, and withdraw caveat 008787J. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.