VK Rajah SC

VK Rajah SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and strata title law. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

VK Rajah SC has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misconduct of arbitrator	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Removal of arbitrator	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proofs of debt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Auditor's liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VK Rajah SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

VK Rajah SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	80% of cases	Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute(Sep 2002) Baring Futures v Deloitte & Touche: Scheme of Arrangement & Auditors' Indemnity Costs(Jan 2002) Goh Chin Soon v Bankruptcy: Appeal of Stay Order Under Section 65(4) of the Bankruptcy Act(Sep 2001)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	20% of cases	Macquarie v Phoenix: Defamation Claim over Emails to Customers(Dec 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of VK Rajah SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Consent	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of VK Rajah SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Consent	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Consent: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Macquarie v Phoenix: Defamation Claim over Emails to Customers 29 Dec 2003 Macquarie Corporate Telecommunications Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Dec 2003	Macquarie Corporate Telecommunications Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute 20 Sep 2002 Koh Bros Building and Civil Engineering Contractor Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	20 Sep 2002	Koh Bros Building and Civil Engineering Contractor Pte Ltd (Applicant): Motion GrantedMotion to remove the arbitrator was granted. The contractors’ costs shall be paid by the employers, as taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Baring Futures v Deloitte & Touche: Scheme of Arrangement & Auditors' Indemnity Costs 27 Jan 2002 Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Respondent)Consent	27 Jan 2002	Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Respondent): Singapore Scheme sanctionedThe court sanctioned the Singapore Scheme as approved by the requisite majority in value of the creditors.
4	Goh Chin Soon v Bankruptcy: Appeal of Stay Order Under Section 65(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 11 Sep 2001 Goh Chin Soon (Appellant, Petitioner)Won	11 Sep 2001	Goh Chin Soon (Appellant, Petitioner): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and orders made in terms of the notice of appeal of the petitioner.
5	Ong Khim Heng Daniel v Leonie Court: En-Bloc Sale, Strata Titles Board Approval & Contractual Obligations 16 Nov 2000 Ong Khim Heng Daniel (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	16 Nov 2000	Ong Khim Heng Daniel (Plaintiff, Defendant): Declaration that the agreement continues to be valid and binding until the Board has ruled on the second applicationThe court declared that the plaintiffs are entitled to assert that the agreement continues to be valid and binding until the Board has ruled on the second application to the Board.