VM Vidthiya

VM Vidthiya is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and personal injury. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

VM Vidthiya has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Government Subsidies	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collateral Benefits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pioneer Generation Package	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	VM Vidthiya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

VM Vidthiya has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	2 cases	50% of cases	Eng Beng v Lo Kok Jong: Recovery of Medical Expenses with Government Subsidies(Mar 2023) The Subsidiary Management Corporation v Janaed: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Contributory Negligence at Westgate Tower(Jun 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	BPC v BPB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance Dispute(Jan 2019)
Victory Law Chambers LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Lo Kok Jong v Eng Beng: Double Recovery Rule & Government Subsidies in Personal Injury Claims(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of VM Vidthiya's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of VM Vidthiya's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	39,515.08	9,878.774 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lo Kok Jong v Eng Beng: Double Recovery Rule & Government Subsidies in Personal Injury Claims 07 Aug 2024 Eng Beng (Respondent)Lost	07 Aug 2024	Eng Beng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; government subsidies and grants should be deducted from the damages payable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Eng Beng v Lo Kok Jong: Recovery of Medical Expenses with Government Subsidies 19 Mar 2023 Eng Beng (Appellant)Won	19 Mar 2023	Eng Beng (Appellant): Appeal allowed in fullAppellant awarded an additional sum of $39,515.08 in special damages to be recovered from the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	The Subsidiary Management Corporation v Janaed: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Contributory Negligence at Westgate Tower 20 Jun 2022 Janaed (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jun 2022	Janaed (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedJanaed's appeal against STA and MCST was dismissed.
4	BPC v BPB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance Dispute 09 Jan 2019 BPC (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	09 Jan 2019	BPC (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Wife's appeal was dismissed.