Walter Ferix Justine

Walter Ferix Justine is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disclosure of documents and striking out. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in estoppel and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Estoppel	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Total Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Walter Ferix Justine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Walter Ferix Justine has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Striking Out of Statement of Claim for Breach of Unless Orders(Jul 2013) Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Appeal for Debt Assignment and Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders(Aug 2012) Deldar Tony Singh v Rajinder Singh: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Leave Under Companies Act(Aug 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Walter Ferix Justine's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Walter Ferix Justine's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	720,781.40	360,390.702 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Striking Out of Statement of Claim for Breach of Unless Orders 02 Jul 2013 Mitora Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	02 Jul 2013	Mitora Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with no order of costs. Cost orders below were not disturbed.
2	Mitora Pte Ltd v Agritrade International: Appeal for Debt Assignment and Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders 29 Aug 2012 Mitora Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2012	Mitora Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedRegistrar's Appeal No 322 of 2011 and Registrar's Appeal No 323 of 2011 dismissed.
3	Deldar Tony Singh v Rajinder Singh: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Leave Under Companies Act 27 Aug 2012 Liquidator (Defendant)Won	27 Aug 2012	Liquidator (Defendant): Claim Struck OutStatement of Claim in Suit 444 struck out in favour of the second and third defendants.
4	ATS Specialized Inc. v LAP Projects: Dispute over Tripartite Set-Off Agreement for Trucking Services 16 Aug 2012 ATS Specialized Inc. (trading as ATA Wind Energy Services) (Plaintiff)Won	16 Aug 2012	ATS Specialized Inc. (trading as ATA Wind Energy Services) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for the full sum of US$325,781.40, as the amount owing under the March 2011 Contract, with interest payable at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ of Summons to date of payment. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the costs of the action.
5	Yip Holdings v Asia Link: Damages for Breach of Contract & Crane Damage 12 Oct 2011 Asia Link Marine Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	12 Oct 2011	Asia Link Marine Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partThe defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of US$395,000 (equivalent to S$516,265) being the value of the Crane after deducting the sum of US$5,000. The defendant is to take over the plaintiff’s proprietary interest in the Crane “as is, where is”.