Wan Rui Jie Erwin

Wan Rui Jie Erwin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and recognition of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Club Rules and Regulations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wan Rui Jie Erwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wan Rui Jie Erwin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Taylor Vinters Via LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Ling Kong Henry v Tanglin Club: Stay of Court Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement Scope(Jul 2018) Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings(Apr 2018)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wan Rui Jie Erwin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wan Rui Jie Erwin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,500.00	4,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Heince Tombak Simanjuntak v Paulus Tannos: Recognition of Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders in Singapore 17 Sep 2019 William E. Daniel (Applicant)Won	17 Sep 2019	William E. Daniel (Applicant): Application grantedRecognition granted to the Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders, empowering the applicants to administer the respondents’ property in Singapore, subject to certain conditions.
2	Ling Kong Henry v Tanglin Club: Stay of Court Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement Scope 02 Jul 2018 Ling Kong Henry (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	02 Jul 2018	Ling Kong Henry (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and the hearing below were awarded to the Club and fixed, including disbursements, at $4,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings 05 Apr 2018 Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	05 Apr 2018	Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim for groundless threats initially allowed, but injunction reversed on appeal. Costs order adjusted.