Wee Jee Kin

Wee Jee Kin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and assessment of damages. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Art Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Jee Kin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wee Jee Kin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bogaars and Din	2 cases	50% of cases	Muhammad Shaun Eric v Ng Ah Tee: Causation of Injuries in Negligence Claim(Nov 2004) Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe: Road Accident, Personal Injury, and Damages Assessment(Jul 2004)
JK Law Chambers	1 cases	25% of cases	Lee Sim Leng v SMRT Buses Ltd: Personal Injury Claim - Damages Assessment(Jan 2025)
Bogaars & Din	1 cases	25% of cases	Polar Arts v Hotline KTV: Assessment of Damages for Water Damage to Qing Dynasty Scrolls(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wee Jee Kin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wee Jee Kin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	582,195.64	145,548.914 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Sim Leng v SMRT Buses Ltd: Personal Injury Claim - Damages Assessment 19 Jan 2025 Lee Sim Leng (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Jan 2025	Lee Sim Leng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $17,373.16 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Muhammad Shaun Eric v Ng Ah Tee: Causation of Injuries in Negligence Claim 30 Nov 2004 Ng Ah Tee (Defendant)Partial	30 Nov 2004	Ng Ah Tee (Defendant): Partial JudgmentConsent judgment was entered against the defendant with the plaintiff agreeing to bear 10% of the liability and the third party to indemnity the defendant for 15% of the damages that the defendant has to pay to the plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe: Road Accident, Personal Injury, and Damages Assessment 11 Jul 2004 Teo Cheng Hoe (Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2004	Teo Cheng Hoe (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $344,632.73 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Polar Arts v Hotline KTV: Assessment of Damages for Water Damage to Qing Dynasty Scrolls 07 Mar 2004 Polar Arts of Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Mar 2004	Polar Arts of Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded in the sum of S$209,080.75, with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).