Wee Qian Liang

Wee Qian Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	3 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	21% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	21% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Qian Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wee Qian Liang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chong Chia & Lim LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Choi Peng Kum v Tan Poh Eng Construction: SOPA & Termination of Contract Dispute(Dec 2013) Choi Peng Kum v Tan Poh Eng: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOP Act(Jul 2013)
Characterist LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Hon Industries v Wan Sheng Hao: SOPA Adjudication Determination Set Aside Application(Nov 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wee Qian Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wee Qian Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	480,109.97	240,054.992 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Choi Peng Kum v Tan Poh Eng Construction: SOPA & Termination of Contract Dispute 17 Dec 2013 Tan Poh Eng Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	17 Dec 2013	Tan Poh Eng Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant for the adjudicated amount. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
2	Choi Peng Kum v Tan Poh Eng: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOP Act 04 Jul 2013 Tan Poh Eng Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2013	Tan Poh Eng Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Hon Industries v Wan Sheng Hao: SOPA Adjudication Determination Set Aside Application 15 Nov 2011 Wan Sheng Hao Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Nov 2011	Wan Sheng Hao Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication Determination UpheldThe adjudication determination in favor of the defendant was upheld.