Wendy Tan

Wendy Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wendy Tan has demonstrated expertise across 91 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	18 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale Pendente Lite	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discontinuance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Renunciation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Default Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time bars	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hague-Visby Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bill of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affirmation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mala Fide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement of Action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Document of Title	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Handwriting Analysis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wendy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wendy Tan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haq & Selvam	8 cases	40% of cases	PT Soonlee v Synergy Shipping: Unseaworthy Barge & Liability for Lost Cargo(Jul 2007) Pacific Integrated Logistics v Gorman Vernel: Security for Costs in Cross-Border Cargo Damage Claim(Jan 2007) Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Champerty, Contract Formation & Revision(Dec 2006)
Haq and Selvam	5 cases	25% of cases	Dalian Hualiang v Louis Dreyfus: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act Interpretation(Sep 2005) AP Moller-Maersk v Special Entertainment: Interpleader, Cargo Claims & Storage Charges(Jan 2005) Hailisen Shipping v Pan-United Shipyard: Interpretation of Supreme Court of Judicature Act s 34(2)(a)(Nov 2003)
Stamford Law Corporation	4 cases	20% of cases	Alpha Bank S.A. v The "Sea Urchin": Application for Direct Judicial Sale of Vessel(Feb 2014) Mohd Zain v Chimbusco: Guarantee Rescission & Bankruptcy Stay(Jan 2014) Chimbusco v Jalalludin: Guarantee Enforcement & Insolvency Proceedings(Feb 2013)
KhattarWong	2 cases	10% of cases	Malayan Banking Bhd v United Arab Shipping Co: Bills of Lading & Delivery Without Presentation(Nov 2008) The Duden: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Waiver in Arbitration under Hague-Visby Rules(Sep 2008)
Colin Ng & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	Fortune Hong Kong Trading v Neptra Shipping: Bill of Lading Dispute & Cargo Release(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wendy Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 5 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.5 parties avg	2.5	30%
Neutral	24.7 parties avg	4.7	10%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Won	103.1 parties avg	3.1	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	52.3 parties avg	2.3
2005	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2006	43.2 parties avg	3.2
2007	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2014	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wendy Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(30%)	30%
Neutral	2(10%)	10%
Partial	2(10%)	10%
Won	10(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	107,500.00	10,750.0010 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Alpha Bank S.A. v The "Sea Urchin": Application for Direct Judicial Sale of Vessel 06 Feb 2014 Pacific Bulk Shipping (Cayman) Ltd (Other)Neutral	06 Feb 2014	Pacific Bulk Shipping (Cayman) Ltd (Other): NeutralPacific Bulk supported the Bank's application, which was ultimately dismissed.
2	Mohd Zain v Chimbusco: Guarantee Rescission & Bankruptcy Stay 22 Jan 2014 Chimbusco International Petroleum (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Jan 2014	Chimbusco International Petroleum (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements and the costs of withdrawing SUM 1964). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chimbusco v Jalalludin: Guarantee Enforcement & Insolvency Proceedings 27 Feb 2013 Chimbusco International Petroleum (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Feb 2013	Chimbusco International Petroleum (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffCosts awarded to the plaintiff for the Registrar's Appeals fixed at S$10,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	MGA International v. Wajilam Exports: Trade Finance Commission Dispute 28 Oct 2010 Wajilam Exports (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Oct 2010	Wajilam Exports (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial LossWajilam was ordered to refund over-deducted commission with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Malayan Banking Bhd v United Arab Shipping Co: Bills of Lading & Delivery Without Presentation 18 Nov 2008 United Arab Shipping Co (S.A.G.) (Defendant)Partial	18 Nov 2008	United Arab Shipping Co (S.A.G.) (Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The court allowed the plaintiff to set off the order for damages and costs against the costs order.
6	The Duden: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Waiver in Arbitration under Hague-Visby Rules 08 Sep 2008 Respondents/Plaintiffs (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	08 Sep 2008	Respondents/Plaintiffs (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs fixed at $2,500 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	PT Soonlee v Synergy Shipping: Unseaworthy Barge & Liability for Lost Cargo 26 Jul 2007 Freighter Services Pte Ltd (Third Party)Lost	26 Jul 2007	Freighter Services Pte Ltd (Third Party): Indemnify DefendantThird party to indemnify the defendant in respect of the plaintiff’s claim.
8	Pacific Integrated Logistics v Gorman Vernel: Security for Costs in Cross-Border Cargo Damage Claim 02 Jan 2007 Gorman Vernel International Freight Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	02 Jan 2007	Gorman Vernel International Freight Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; required to provide security for costs in the amount of S$60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Champerty, Contract Formation & Revision 26 Dec 2006 Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Dec 2006	Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedOtech's appeal was dismissed as the court found no agreement to vary the remuneration formula.
10	UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine: Discovery of Documents & Handwriting Samples in Insurance Claim 06 Aug 2006 Lim Beng Wee (Other)Neutral	06 Aug 2006	Lim Beng Wee (Other): NeutralThe non-party was not required to provide handwriting samples.
11	Sumpiles Investments v AXA Insurance: Marine Policy Claim for Crane Damage 19 Apr 2006 Sumpiles Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Apr 2006	Sumpiles Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Breach of Oral Contract & Inducement Claim 29 Mar 2006 Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2006	Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOtech's claim against Clough Engineering Ltd was dismissed with costs.
13	Dalian Hualiang v Louis Dreyfus: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act Interpretation 06 Sep 2005 Dalian Jinshi Oil-Making Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2005	Dalian Jinshi Oil-Making Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favour of Dalian Jinshi Oil-Making Co Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	AP Moller-Maersk v Special Entertainment: Interpleader, Cargo Claims & Storage Charges 25 Jan 2005 Others (Respondent)Won	25 Jan 2005	Others (Respondent): Successful Resistance of AppealSuccessfully resisted the appeal against the interim order.
15	Hailisen Shipping v Pan-United Shipyard: Interpretation of Supreme Court of Judicature Act s 34(2)(a) 05 Nov 2003 Pan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2003	Pan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal Allowed to ProceedPan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd's appeal was allowed to proceed.
16	Pan-United Shipyard Pte Ltd v The “Dilmun Fulmar”: Arrest of Vessel After Settlement Agreement Dispute 30 Oct 2003 Hailisen Shipping Co Ltd (Interveners)Won	30 Oct 2003	Hailisen Shipping Co Ltd (Interveners): Appeal AllowedDefendants’ appeal allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
17	Hua Seng Sawmill v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Insurable Interest & Washing Overboard 08 Oct 2003 QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant)Won	08 Oct 2003	QBE Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's claim.
18	Moguntia-Est Epices SA v Sea-Hawk Freight: Discontinuance & Reinstatement of Action 07 Oct 2003 Moguntia-Est Epices SA (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2003	Moguntia-Est Epices SA (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedPlaintiffs' appeal to reinstate the action was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	M-Power v Goodway: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Misdelivered Cargo Claim 28 Aug 2003 Goodway Agencies (Shipping) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	28 Aug 2003	Goodway Agencies (Shipping) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Default Judgment Set AsideDefault judgment set aside; allowed to enter an appearance and defend the action. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
20	Fortune Hong Kong Trading v Neptra Shipping: Bill of Lading Dispute & Cargo Release 14 Aug 2001 Fortune Hong Kong Trading Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Aug 2001	Fortune Hong Kong Trading Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.