William J M Ricquier

William J M Ricquier is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in resulting trusts and trust law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

William J M Ricquier has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and commercial leasing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sub-Lease Agreement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Novation Agreements	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	William J M Ricquier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

William J M Ricquier has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Incisive Law LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	MK Distripark v Pedder Warehousing: Breach of Sub-Lease & Failure to Obtain JTC Approval(Apr 2013)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	1 cases	50% of cases	Lai Min Tet v Lai Min Kin: Resulting Trust, Presumption of Advancement & Family Property Dispute(Jan 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of William J M Ricquier's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of William J M Ricquier's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MK Distripark v Pedder Warehousing: Breach of Sub-Lease & Failure to Obtain JTC Approval 21 Apr 2013 MK Distripark Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Apr 2013	MK Distripark Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of the sub-lease was dismissed.
2	Lai Min Tet v Lai Min Kin: Resulting Trust, Presumption of Advancement & Family Property Dispute 08 Jan 2004 Lai Min Fee (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2004	Lai Min Fee (Plaintiff, Respondent): Originating Summons grantedThe court declared that the property is held on trust by LMK and Robert for themselves as well as for LMT and LMF in four equal shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).