Wilson Ang

Wilson Ang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wilson Ang has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wilson Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wilson Ang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier	2 cases	100% of cases	Krishna's India Pte Ltd v Arulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale(Jun 2001) Krishna's India v Abdulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wilson Ang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wilson Ang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000,000.00	4,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Krishna's India Pte Ltd v Arulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale 28 Jun 2001 Vadivelu Chandran (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2001	Vadivelu Chandran (Defendant): Claim for damages for loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m succeedsThe plaintiffs succeed in their claim for damages for the loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m. The damages payable to KIP will be assessed by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Krishna's India v Abdulmozhi: Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Property Sale 28 Jun 2001 Vadivelu Chandran (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2001	Vadivelu Chandran (Defendant): Claim UpheldThe plaintiffs succeed in their claim for damages for the loss suffered as a result of the sale of the Serangoon properties to Mr Chandran for $4m. The damages payable to KIP will be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.