Wilson Hue Kuan Chen

Wilson Hue Kuan Chen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and ad hoc admission. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Police Regulations	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Compensation Fund	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wilson Hue Kuan Chen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Ng Hock Guan v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Dismissal from Singapore Police Force(Nov 2003)
Attorney-General	1 cases	50% of cases	Howe v Thomas: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Singapore Patent Infringement Action(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wilson Hue Kuan Chen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wilson Hue Kuan Chen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Hock Guan v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Dismissal from Singapore Police Force 17 Nov 2003 Attorney-General (Defendant)Lost	17 Nov 2003	Attorney-General (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's position was rejected, and the plaintiff's claim was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Howe v Thomas: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Singapore Patent Infringement Action 13 Aug 2001 Attorney-General (Respondent)Neutral	13 Aug 2001	Attorney-General (Respondent): NeutralThe Attorney General was a respondent in the application.