Wilson Zhu

Wilson Zhu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in mental capacity law and medical law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wilson Zhu has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wilson Zhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wilson Zhu has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies(May 2015) Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence(Sep 2013) Loh Sioh Hon v Loh Siok Moey: Estate Distribution, Loan Set-Off, and Rental Income Dispute(Feb 2012)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wilson Zhu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	20%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wilson Zhu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 Swiber Offshore Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	Swiber Offshore Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Directions givenDirections given to the judicial managers.
2	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Second Respondent (Respondent)Partial	18 May 2015	Second Respondent (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, but the court found that the third respondent lacked capacity due to a combination of mental impairment and undue influence, which negatively impacts the second respondent.
3	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence 30 Sep 2013 AI (Appellant, Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2013	AI (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; original decision set aside; costs reversed in appellant's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Loh Sioh Hon v Loh Siok Moey: Estate Distribution, Loan Set-Off, and Rental Income Dispute 13 Feb 2012 Loh Siok Moey (Respondent)Lost	13 Feb 2012	Loh Siok Moey (Respondent): Respondent ordered to account for all rentals collectedRespondent was ordered to account to the Appellant for all the rentals collected in respect of the premises since the Deceased passed away, subject to such deduction for expenses incurred by the Respondent to maintain the premises.
5	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Bias 29 Nov 2011 LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2011	LIM MEY LEE SUSAN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.