Wong Nan Shee

Wong Nan Shee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bills of exchange law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Nominee Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Compensation for delays	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Friendly Loans	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Default Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Nan Shee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Nan Shee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee Mun Hooi and Co	6 cases	100% of cases	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act(Sep 2005) TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims(May 2005) Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Nan Shee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	67%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	17%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2005	45.7 parties avg	5.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Nan Shee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	578,911.90	115,782.385 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act 20 Sep 2005 Henny Sutanto (Appellant)Lost	20 Sep 2005	Henny Sutanto (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
2	TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims 30 May 2005 TR Networks Inc (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	30 May 2005	TR Networks Inc (Plaintiff, Appellant): Assistant registrar’s order variedAssistant registrar’s order varied by adding the condition that the fifth defendant provide security for the sums claimed, either by way of banker’s guarantee or in such other form as may be agreed between the parties, within 21 days and that in default thereof, the plaintiffs be at liberty to enter judgment against him for the said sums. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute 25 Apr 2005 Henny Sutanto (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Apr 2005	Henny Sutanto (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the second defendant was dismissed with costs. The default judgment against the first defendant was set aside as irregular. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Soon Li Heng v Woon Contractors: Sub-contractor's Claim Dispute over Earthworks Payment 17 Feb 2005 Woon Contractors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2005	Woon Contractors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim of $537,681.25 was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Fraser Securities v Seet Ai Kiang: Summary Judgment & Parol Evidence Rule 14 Jan 2004 Seet Ai Kiang (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Jan 2004	Seet Ai Kiang (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment stands against the defendant for $578,911.90 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Sutanto Henny v Suriani Tani: Striking Out Claim for Cheque Payment 13 Jan 2004 Sutanto Henny (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	13 Jan 2004	Sutanto Henny (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe plaintiff's appeal against the decision to strike out her claim was allowed.