Wong Pei Ting

Wong Pei Ting is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and costs. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated expertise across 76 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	10 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Escrow Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Due Diligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Issuance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Pei Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Pei Ting has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	15 cases	100% of cases	W. Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power: Striking Out & Amendment in Joint Venture Dispute(Oct 2024) Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Pei Ting's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 9 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	20%
Neutral	26.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Partial	45.8 parties avg	5.8	27%
Won	62.8 parties avg	2.8	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	36.3 parties avg	6.3
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	53.6 parties avg	3.6
2024	43.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Pei Ting's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(20%)	20%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%
Partial	4(27%)	27%
Won	6(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	744,000.00	106,285.717 cases	7
USD	1,485,460,000.00	742,730,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	3 21	Neutral: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2024	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	W. Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power: Striking Out & Amendment in Joint Venture Dispute 14 Oct 2024 Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Oct 2024	Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment entered in favor of Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd; W. Power Group EOOD to pay Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd's costs of the proceedings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with adjustments to the quantification of compensation. The original award was US$742.73m. The final amount will be adjusted based on the court's findings. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance 27 May 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 May 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to vary or discharge the order setting aside the service out order was dismissed.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute 26 Mar 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialThe court upheld the examination order but set aside the order granting leave to serve Ms. Fan out of jurisdiction, and consequently, the substituted service order. The court also set aside the order granting leave to serve Mr. Ruan out of jurisdiction, subject to any application made within 10 days by the parties or either of them to vary or discharge the order.
5	W. Power Group EOOD v. Ming Yang Wind Power: Security for Costs Application 09 Nov 2023 Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 Nov 2023	Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant): Costs awardedDefendant awarded costs of the application in SUM 13 assessed in the amount of $6,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute 01 Nov 2023 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant, Applicant)Partial	01 Nov 2023	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant, Applicant): Stay of execution granted on conditionStay of execution granted on the condition that the defendant pays into Court the full amount of the judgment sums plus post-judgment interest.
7	W. Power Group EOOD v. Ming Yang Wind Power: Security for Costs in Wind Farm Joint Venture Dispute 28 Sep 2023 Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2023	Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd (Defendant): Security for costs grantedDefendant's application for security for costs granted; claimant ordered to provide security of SGD 70,000 for the defendant's costs up to the commencement of trial. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant)Lost	18 Sep 2023	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant breached its duty to the plaintiffs to safeguard the Trust assets as at 30 March 2008 and is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for their loss. The defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.
9	Lim Chang Huat v Stronghold Global Holdings: Breach of Contract and Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence 12 Sep 2023 Stronghold Global Holdings Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	12 Sep 2023	Stronghold Global Holdings Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs fixed at $80,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	EFG Bank AG v Surewin Worldwide: Costs Allocation After Security Interest Ruling 30 Jan 2022 Singfor Life Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Jan 2022	Singfor Life Insurance Co Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paid to PlaintiffThe second defendant shall pay to the plaintiff its costs of and incidental to this action in the sum of $588,000 as claimed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract 25 Jan 2021 CIF (Defendant)Won	25 Jan 2021	CIF (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Claimant's application to set aside portions of the arbitration award was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Forum Non Conveniens & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Trust Dispute 17 Jan 2019 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant)Won	17 Jan 2019	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant): Application for Stay GrantedApplication for stay of proceedings granted.
13	Re Swiber Holdings Ltd: Trustee's Voting Rights & Expenses in Judicial Management 30 Sep 2018 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other)Neutral	30 Sep 2018	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other): No specific outcomeUnited Overseas Bank Ltd was the Security Agent for United Overseas Bank Ltd, the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, Bank of America, NA and UniCredit Bank AG.
14	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other): NeutralUOB submitted a proof of debt to the Judicial Managers based on the corporate guarantees executed by SHL.
15	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	16 Jan 2018	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.