Wong Tze Roy

Wong Tze Roy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and performance bond. Their track record shows a 56.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Secretarial Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Provisional liquidators	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Part Performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Tze Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Tze Roy has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Goh JP & Wong	4 cases	44% of cases	Hu Lee Impex v Lim Aik Seng: Enforceability of Oral Agreement for Shop Unit Tenancy Assignment(Jul 2013) Ng Tsorng Chinn v Vijaykumar Nanalal Shah: Adverse Possession Claim over Land Lot(Mar 2012) Sincastle Enterprises v Sulzer Chemtech & Power-Vac: Contractual Obligation for Goods & Services(Sep 2011)
Goh JP & Wong LLC	3 cases	33% of cases	Huber’s Pte Ltd v Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd: Court-Ordered Easements, Land Titles Act, Property Redevelopment(Sep 2024) Sito Construction v PBT Engineering: SOPA, Jurisdictional Objection & Waiver(Jan 2019) BAJ v BAK: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Singapore Divorce Case(May 2016)
Lee Mun Hooi & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute(Jan 2017)
JP & Wong	1 cases	11% of cases	Lumbini Pte Ltd v Toh Peng Noi: Transfer of Business Assets Dispute(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Tze Roy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	55.0 parties avg	5.0	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Tze Roy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	5(56%)	56%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	209,692.27	29,956.047 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Huber’s Pte Ltd v Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd: Court-Ordered Easements, Land Titles Act, Property Redevelopment 05 Sep 2024 Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	05 Sep 2024	Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for temporary court-ordered easements was allowed, with costs to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondent in the sum of $10,000, excluding disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sito Construction v PBT Engineering: SOPA, Jurisdictional Objection & Waiver 13 Jan 2019 PBT Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2019	PBT Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
3	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute 08 Jan 2017 Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jan 2017	Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for an interim injunction and Erinford Order was dismissed.
4	BAJ v BAK: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Singapore Divorce Case 04 May 2016 BAK (Defendant)Partial	04 May 2016	BAK (Defendant): Division of matrimonial propertyReceived 47.5% of the net sale proceeds from the matrimonial property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Hu Lee Impex v Lim Aik Seng: Enforceability of Oral Agreement for Shop Unit Tenancy Assignment 25 Jul 2013 Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jul 2013	Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for an order that the defendant assigns the tenancy of a shop unit was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ng Tsorng Chinn v Vijaykumar Nanalal Shah: Adverse Possession Claim over Land Lot 14 Mar 2012 Ng Tsorng Chinn (Plaintiff)Won	14 Mar 2012	Ng Tsorng Chinn (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedThe Plaintiffs' claim in this action is allowed with costs to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Sincastle Enterprises v Sulzer Chemtech & Power-Vac: Contractual Obligation for Goods & Services 15 Sep 2011 Sincastle Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Sep 2011	Sincastle Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff against the first defendant, Sulzer Chemtech Pty Ltd, for $191,692.27 with interest accrued at 5.33% per annum from the date it fell due (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Ee Kee Chai v Chew Joo Song John: Setting Aside Order for Provisional Liquidators Due to Material Non-Disclosure 11 Dec 2006 Tiagarajan Vemala Devi (Defendant)Won	11 Dec 2006	Tiagarajan Vemala Devi (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts to the second defendant fixed at $8,000, plus disbursements to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Lumbini Pte Ltd v Toh Peng Noi: Transfer of Business Assets Dispute 23 Apr 2002 SK-SK Tan & Co (Third Party)Won	23 Apr 2002	SK-SK Tan & Co (Third Party): Claim DismissedClaims against the Third Party were dismissed.