Wong Yong Jing, Justin

Wong Yong Jing, Justin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in natural forum and civil procedure. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Yong Jing, Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Yong Jing, Justin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	MAN Diesel v IM Skaugen: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Dec 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Yong Jing, Justin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Yong Jing, Justin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MAN Diesel v IM Skaugen: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 03 Dec 2019 IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	03 Dec 2019	IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal allowed; respondents to pay appellants costs of the appeal, the two applications for leave to adduce further evidence and the application for leave to appeal, fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. The costs orders below shall be reversed in favor of the appellants. The usual consequential orders, if any, will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.