Woo Shu Yan

Woo Shu Yan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 59.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 42% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated expertise across 109 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	13 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	11 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	11 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	10 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustees Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conventions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Disqualification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Regulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alternative Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charter Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Regulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bareboat charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Woo Shu Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Woo Shu Yan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 26 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	26 cases	100% of cases	Sullivan v Hill Capital: Striking Out Action Against Director for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2024) Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024) Sullivan v Hill Capital: Trust Administration, Proper Law, and Forum Disputes(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Woo Shu Yan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 11 (42%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	12%
Neutral	25.0 parties avg	5.0	8%
Partial	54.9 parties avg	4.9	19%
Won	164.0 parties avg	4.0	62%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	54.7 parties avg	4.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Woo Shu Yan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	3(11%)	11%
Neutral	2(7%)	7%
Partial	5(19%)	19%
Won	16(59%)	59%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CHF	9,500,000.00	9,500,000.001 cases	1
SGD	142,000.00	14,200.0010 cases	10
USD	7,435,159,424.23	2,478,386,474.743 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2012	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2021	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sullivan v Hill Capital: Striking Out Action Against Director for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 31 Jul 2024 Sullivan, Sir Cornelius Sean (Applicant)Lost	31 Jul 2024	Sullivan, Sir Cornelius Sean (Applicant): Action against second respondent dismissedThe prayers for relief sought against Ms Ban in OA 820 are struck out and the action against her is dismissed.
2	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Bera Ivanishvili (Respondent)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Bera Ivanishvili (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe respondents were successful in defending the appeal on the key points, with the court upholding the finding of breach of fiduciary duty and the use of the Whole Portfolio Model for quantification. The compensation award of US$742.73m was adjusted, but the respondents remained the more successful party. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
3	Sullivan v Hill Capital: Trust Administration, Proper Law, and Forum Disputes 19 Jun 2024 Sir Cornelius Sean Sullivan (Applicant)Won	19 Jun 2024	Sir Cornelius Sean Sullivan (Applicant): Appeals allowedRespondents to pay the applicant costs, fixed at $12,000 per respondent (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Civelli v Aster Capital: Hague Convention, Evidence Act & Appointment of Private Examiner 30 May 2024 Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Appellant)Won	30 May 2024	Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; private examination before Ms Fischer of Mr Jacquin takes place in the presence of and under the direction of the Registrar in Chambers.
5	Baker v BCS: Contempt of Court for Anti-Suit Injunction Breach & Director Disqualification 22 Jan 2024 Baker, Michael A (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jan 2024	Baker, Michael A (Plaintiff): Contempt order against BCS and WeberContempt order granted against BCS and Weber. Application for director disqualification order against Weber dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2023	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.
7	BCS Business Consulting Services v Baker: Anti-Suit Injunction & Protection of Singapore Court Judgments 20 Sep 2022 Michael A Baker (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	20 Sep 2022	Michael A Baker (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; anti-suit injunction remains in effect. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
8	Baker v BCS Business Consulting: Accounting for Trust Assets & Trustee Duties 20 Sep 2022 Michael A Baker (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	20 Sep 2022	Michael A Baker (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at S$30,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Baker v BCS Business Consulting: Account of Trust Assets & Ethocyn Rights 26 Dec 2021 Michael A Baker (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Dec 2021	Michael A Baker (Plaintiff): Partial Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$7,859,424.23 plus CHF1,662,894.67. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) for the original claim. However, the judgment specifies USD and CHF for the amounts to be paid.
10	Baker v BCS: Anti-Suit Injunction Granted in Ethocyn Rights Trust Dispute 18 Nov 2021 Baker, Michael A (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Nov 2021	Baker, Michael A (Plaintiff): Anti-suit injunction granted in partAnti-suit injunction granted in part, restraining the defendants from relitigating the existence, validity, and enforceability of a trust over Ethocyn rights, but allowing them to pursue claims related to Baker's alleged misrepresentation and the settlement agreement with Nu Skin.
11	Easybook.com v OWW Investments: Striking Out Claim for RCPS Redemption Rights 22 Nov 2020 Easybook.com Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Dismissed	22 Nov 2020	Easybook.com Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
12	NSL Oilchem v Prosper Marine: Contractual Disputes, Breach, and Guarantees 28 Sep 2020 NSL Oilchem Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Sep 2020	NSL Oilchem Marine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on all claims. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
13	Mulacek v Civelli: Appeal on Forum Non Conveniens and Anti-Suit Injunction in Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty Claims 14 Jun 2020 Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	14 Jun 2020	Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and disbursements fixed at a global figure of $45,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights 28 Apr 2020 Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2020	Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favour of Baker, on behalf of the Estate, against Weber in the sum of CHF9.5 million plus interest at the rate of 3% per annum to the plaintiff, calculated from the date of the loan to the date of judgment; thereafter, for the avoidance of doubt, interest at 5.33% per annum shall run pursuant to para 77 of the Supreme Court Practice Directions.
15	Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute 13 Aug 2019 Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Aug 2019	Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Plaintiff): NeutralOutcome for Aster Capital S.A. (LTD) Panama is tied to the outcome for Carlo Giuseppe Civelli, as they are co-plaintiffs in Suit 1159/2017. The court's decision impacts both parties equally.
16	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Recovery of Dividends & Share Ownership Dispute 11 Mar 2015 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2015	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed regarding the existence of a settlement agreement. The court found that a settlement agreement existed but was repudiated by the other party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Dispute over SinCo Technologies Dividends and Share Transfer 15 Apr 2014 Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2014	Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	MAS v Huang Zhong Xuan: Injunction for Securities Act Breach & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 11 Nov 2013 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2013	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPermanent injunction granted against the defendants.
19	Re Andrews Geraldine Mary QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore 14 Nov 2012 Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant)Neutral	14 Nov 2012	Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant): Application OpposedDefendant opposed the application for ad hoc admission.
20	Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrong Choice of Law 13 Aug 2012 Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2012	Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application to set aside the arbitration awards was dismissed, upholding the awards in favor of the defendant.
21	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading 17 Nov 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent)Lost	17 Nov 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 Consumers Association of Singapore (Defendant)Won	17 May 2011	Consumers Association of Singapore (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Settlement Agreement Dispute 15 May 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 May 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's appeal.
24	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Striking Out 'Without Prejudice' Communications in Trust Dispute 28 Jan 2010 Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to strike out paragraphs in the Statement of Claim and affidavit was granted.
25	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders 02 Jun 2008 Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff)Won	02 Jun 2008	Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
26	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Discovery, Production of Documents & Inspection 21 Aug 2007 Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Aug 2007	Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff): Appeal Dismissed for the most partAppeal dismissed for the most part and costs fixed at $10,000 with disbursements to be taxed, if parties were unable to agree on the quantum of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.