Wu Yu Jie

Wu Yu Jie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Impossible attempt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wu Yu Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wu Yu Jie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements(Mar 2020) Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor: Impossible Attempt, Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2020) Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wu Yu Jie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	80%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wu Yu Jie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements 30 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	30 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially lostAppeal allowed in part. Conviction for trafficking in diamorphine set aside, substituted with conviction for possession. Conviction for trafficking in cannabis set aside.
2	Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor: Impossible Attempt, Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original Conviction OverturnedThe Court of Appeal overturned the original conviction.
3	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of Zuraimy on the original trafficking charge was dismissed.
4	PP v Jurong Country Club: CPFA, Employee Definition & CPF Contribution 11 Jun 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	11 Jun 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the District Judge’s dismissal of its application for payment of arrears in contributions and interest under s 61B(1) CPFA was dismissed.
5	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine & Wilful Blindness 26 May 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	26 May 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted.