Yan Jiakang

Yan Jiakang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yan Jiakang has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unsoundness of Mind	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yan Jiakang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yan Jiakang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Roszaidi bin Osman: Misuse of Drugs Act & Diminished Responsibility(Jan 2021) Public Prosecutor v Tan Kok Meng: Murder, Unsoundness of Mind(Nov 2020) Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yan Jiakang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yan Jiakang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Roszaidi bin Osman: Misuse of Drugs Act & Diminished Responsibility 31 Jan 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	31 Jan 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Defendant does not qualify for alternative sentencingThe court found that Roszaidi does not satisfy the requirements under s 33B(3)(b) of the MDA and, consequently, cannot avail himself of the alternative sentencing regime under s 33B(1)(b) of the MDA.
2	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kok Meng: Murder, Unsoundness of Mind 02 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Finding that Kok Meng committed the actThe Prosecution sought a finding that Kok Meng committed the act and prayed for an order under 252 of the CPC. The court made a finding that Kok Meng committed the act of causing Mr Tan’s death.
3	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment 22 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially dismissed as Azli's appeal was allowed.