Yang Sue Jen

Yang Sue Jen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and business law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yang Sue Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yang Sue Jen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Characterist LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yang Sue Jen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yang Sue Jen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	8,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lawrence Khong v Singapore Polo Club: Apparent Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings 20 Apr 2014 Lawrence Khong Kin Hoong (Plaintiff)Won	20 Apr 2014	Lawrence Khong Kin Hoong (Plaintiff): Application AllowedApplication to set aside the decision to suspend the Plaintiff’s membership was allowed. Damages to be assessed. Costs of $8,000 inclusive of disbursements awarded to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.