Yap Hao Jin

Yap Hao Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in director's duties and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Hao Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yap Hao Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sim Chong LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions(Jan 2018) Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims(Apr 2017) Re Taisoo Suk: Recognition of Korean Rehabilitation Proceedings for Hanjin Shipping(Sep 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yap Hao Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	25%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	25%
Won	25.3 parties avg	5.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yap Hao Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	784,000.00	261,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	16 Jan 2018	PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the sale of OPL Vessels. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims 24 Apr 2017 PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2017	PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Defendant): LostLiable for 60% of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting to $360,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Re Taisoo Suk: Recognition of Korean Rehabilitation Proceedings for Hanjin Shipping 13 Sep 2016 Taisoo Suk (Applicant)Won	13 Sep 2016	Taisoo Suk (Applicant): Application GrantedOrders granted for recognition of Hanjin's rehabilitation proceedings in Korea, restraint of proceedings against Hanjin and its Singapore subsidiaries, and stay of present proceedings against them, except for the arrest of the Hanjin Rome.
4	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty 30 Mar 2016 PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2016	PARAKOU SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts fixed at $2000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the sixth defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.