Yap Pui Yee

Yap Pui Yee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and negligence.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Data Protection Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Information Technology Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Data Leak	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security Incident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misconfiguration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Pui Yee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yap Pui Yee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dodwell & Co LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	UZN v UZM: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce(Oct 2020) Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd v Ho Soo Fong: Directors' Duties & Breach(Sep 2020)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Razer v Capgemini: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Data Leak(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yap Pui Yee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yap Pui Yee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,785,689.20	2,392,844.602 cases	2
USD	6,418,738.81	6,418,738.811 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Razer v Capgemini: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Data Leak 08 Dec 2022 Capgemini Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2022	Capgemini Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDefendant ordered to pay damages to the plaintiff (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies USD amounts for damages).
2	UZN v UZM: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 29 Oct 2020 UZN (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	29 Oct 2020	UZN (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wife is entitled to $1,195,102.20, being 32% of all the matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd v Ho Soo Fong: Directors' Duties & Breach 14 Sep 2020 Ho Soo Fong (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2020	Ho Soo Fong (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; jointly and severally liable for damages in the amount of $3,590,587 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).