Yau Pui Man

Yau Pui Man is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and prevention of corruption act. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yau Pui Man has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Mercy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Public Sector Governance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
False Information	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Academic Dishonesty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yau Pui Man has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yau Pui Man has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Chew Soo Chun v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing & Judicial Mercy for Ill-Health(Jan 2016) PP v Lim Yong Soon Bernard: False Information to Public Servant & Public Sector Governance(Apr 2015) Tey Tsun Hang v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Gifts, and Academic Favoritism at National University of Singapore(Feb 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yau Pui Man's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yau Pui Man's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chew Soo Chun v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing & Judicial Mercy for Ill-Health 19 Jan 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	19 Jan 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal for a higher sentence was dismissed.
2	PP v Lim Yong Soon Bernard: False Information to Public Servant & Public Sector Governance 09 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Lost	09 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Application dismissedThe Court of Appeal declined to answer the reframed question and dismissed the application.
3	Tey Tsun Hang v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Gifts, and Academic Favoritism at National University of Singapore 27 Feb 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; convictions set aside. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Phang Wah v PP: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act & Public Interest Law 22 Oct 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Oct 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal; the reference was dismissed.