Yek Jia Min Jasmin

Yek Jia Min Jasmin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yek Jia Min Jasmin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yek Jia Min Jasmin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yek Jia Min Jasmin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yek Jia Min Jasmin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute 17 Oct 2013 International Research Corp PLC (Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2013	International Research Corp PLC (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine and/or adjudicate upon the dispute between the Appellant and the Respondent arising out of the Supplemental Agreements. Disbursements and fees paid in the arbitration were to be indemnified by the Respondent. The costs of the arbitration were to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.