Yeo En Fei Walter

Yeo En Fei Walter is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in insolvency law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Insolvency Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign solvent liquidation proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo En Fei Walter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo En Fei Walter has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Manoj Kalwani v Bharat Kalwani: Loan Dispute & Family Business Litigation(Mar 2024) DDI v DDJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Excess of Jurisdiction, Bias, and Breach of Fair Hearing Rule(Mar 2024) Ascentra Holdings v SPGK: Recognition of Foreign Solvent Liquidation Proceedings in Cross-Border Insolvency(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo En Fei Walter's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	34.5 parties avg	4.5	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo En Fei Walter's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,167,620.55	1,389,206.853 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Manoj Kalwani v Bharat Kalwani: Loan Dispute & Family Business Litigation 14 Mar 2024 Manoj Dharmadas Kalwani (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Mar 2024	Manoj Dharmadas Kalwani (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for S$2,837,418.55 for the transfer made to Mr Mike is dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	DDI v DDJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Excess of Jurisdiction, Bias, and Breach of Fair Hearing Rule 13 Mar 2024 DDK (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2024	DDK (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedThe respondents' counterclaim was allowed. The applicant was ordered to refund the first respondent the sum of S$648,601 with interest and in exchange, the first respondent was to transfer the applicant’s shares in Company DA back to him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ascentra Holdings v SPGK: Recognition of Foreign Solvent Liquidation Proceedings in Cross-Border Insolvency 24 Jan 2024 Graham Robinson (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	24 Jan 2024	Graham Robinson (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the Court of Appeal declined to impose the conditions sought by the respondent in respect of the recognition of Ascentra’s Cayman Liquidation as a foreign main proceeding in Singapore, save for the termination of the Automatic Moratorium.
4	Ascentra Holdings v SPGK Pte Ltd: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of Foreign Solvent Liquidation Proceedings 17 Oct 2023 Graham Robinson (Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2023	Graham Robinson (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Ascentra's Cayman Liquidation qualifies as a foreign proceeding. Costs awarded to the appellants fixed at $60,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	All Measure Technology (S) Pte Ltd v RHB Bank Berhad: Moratorium Application under IRDA 16 May 2023 RHB Bank Berhad (Non-party)Won	16 May 2023	RHB Bank Berhad (Non-party): Objection upheldRHB Bank Berhad's objection to the moratorium application was effectively upheld as the application was dismissed.