Yeo Kan Kiang Roy

Yeo Kan Kiang Roy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Timber Ceiling works	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Kan Kiang Roy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sterling Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute(Sep 2024) Wong Kar King v Lim Pang Hern: Oral Contract Dispute over Shares in Advanced Holdings Ltd(Sep 2021) UZR v UZS: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Wife Maintenance in Long Marriage Divorce(Dec 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Kan Kiang Roy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Kan Kiang Roy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,499,161.30	2,166,387.103 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute 03 Sep 2024 Ng Phek Cheng (Defendant)Won	03 Sep 2024	Ng Phek Cheng (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; appeal not allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Kar King v Lim Pang Hern: Oral Contract Dispute over Shares in Advanced Holdings Ltd 29 Sep 2021 Wong Kar King (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	29 Sep 2021	Wong Kar King (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim by Lim Pang Hern was dismissed.
3	UZR v UZS: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Wife Maintenance in Long Marriage Divorce 18 Dec 2019 UZS (Defendant)Partial	18 Dec 2019	UZS (Defendant): PartialMatrimonial assets distributed in the proportions of 47:53 between the Husband and the Wife, with the Husband to transfer S$4,049,758.75 to the Wife within six months from the date of this judgment. Parties to share the costs of her university expenses. No maintenance is ordered for the Wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	See Kian Teck v SG-Bogen Pte Ltd: Breach of Oral Joint Venture Agreement for Construction Project 19 Jul 2015 SG-Bogen Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Jul 2015	SG-Bogen Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).