Yeo Kee Teng Mark

Yeo Kee Teng Mark is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and theft. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Gang-robbery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Kee Teng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Kee Teng Mark has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kalco Law LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	Tay Jie Qi & Low Shauna: Admission to the Bar - Disclosures of Past Misconduct(Mar 2023) ABC v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault by Penetration of Minor & Sentencing Principles(Sep 2022) Public Prosecutor v Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar: Robbery with Firearm by Auxiliary Police Officer(Sep 2022)
Fortress Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Kee Teng Mark's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Kee Teng Mark's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zhejiang Crystal-Optech v Crystal-Moveon: Winding Up for Loss of Substratum & Failure to Commence Business 26 Mar 2024 Nixfol Pte Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	26 Mar 2024	Nixfol Pte Ltd (Non-party): Application dismissedNixfol Pte Ltd appeared as a non-party and opposed the Application. The application was ultimately granted.
2	Tay Jie Qi & Low Shauna: Admission to the Bar - Disclosures of Past Misconduct 08 Mar 2023 Tay Jie Qi (Applicant)Won	08 Mar 2023	Tay Jie Qi (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for admission as an advocate and solicitor allowed.
3	ABC v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault by Penetration of Minor & Sentencing Principles 28 Sep 2022 ABC (Appellant)Won	28 Sep 2022	ABC (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant's sentence reduced to three years and six months’ imprisonment with no caning.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar: Robbery with Firearm by Auxiliary Police Officer 12 Sep 2022 Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar (Defendant)Lost	12 Sep 2022	Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was convicted on all charges.