Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC

Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and civil procedure. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Powers	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trustees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment and Garnishee Orders After Appeal(Jan 2022) CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award(Aug 2021) Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.3 parties avg	4.3	80%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	112,367.12	37,455.713 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment and Garnishee Orders After Appeal 13 Jan 2022 Sanum Investments Limited (Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2022	Sanum Investments Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Sanum to return garnished sums.
2	CNA v CNB: Striking Out Setting Aside Application for International Arbitral Award 12 Aug 2021 CNC (Defendant)Lost	12 Aug 2021	CNC (Defendant): Striking out application dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the originating summons was dismissed.
3	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud 15 Feb 2021 Sureste Properties, Inc (Appellant)Lost	15 Feb 2021	Sureste Properties, Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants must pay the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	BTN v BTP: Costs Judgment for Setting Aside Arbitral Award Application 15 Feb 2021 BTO (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Feb 2021	BTO (Plaintiff): Costs awarded againstPlaintiffs to pay the defendants costs of $50,000 plus disbursements of $6,183.56. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Trust Account, Res Judicata & Trustee Powers 07 Oct 2020 Lakshmi Prataprai Bhojwani (alias Mrs Lakshmi Jethanand Bhojwani) (Defendant)Partial	07 Oct 2020	Lakshmi Prataprai Bhojwani (alias Mrs Lakshmi Jethanand Bhojwani) (Defendant): Partial SuccessWife remains entitled to the account ordered under ORC 50/2019 even though she was no longer a beneficiary from 10 January 2020 onwards, and that the remaining variations sought by the Husband should not be ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).