Yeo Khung Chye

Yeo Khung Chye is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and winding up. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in jurisdiction and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Jurisdiction	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yeo Khung Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Khung Chye has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings(Dec 2003) Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung: Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal on Arbitration Clause(Sep 2003) Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Khung Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.9 parties avg	3.9	60%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Khung Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	127,472.00	42,490.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings 28 Dec 2003 Chinese Chamber Realty Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	28 Dec 2003	Chinese Chamber Realty Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; application for summary judgement cannot be brought before the stay application has been finally disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung: Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal on Arbitration Clause 21 Sep 2003 Church Street Properties Private Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Sep 2003	Church Street Properties Private Limited (Plaintiff): Orders stayed pending appealOrders of Rajendran J stayed pending appeal before the Court of Appeal.
3	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court 14 Aug 2003 China Square Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	14 Aug 2003	China Square Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was dismissed, but the orders were varied. CCR was awarded 75% of the costs of the appeal, fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up 20 Aug 2002 P.T. HM Sampoerna TBK (Applicant)Won	20 Aug 2002	P.T. HM Sampoerna TBK (Applicant): Application grantedSanction was given to the liquidators to make payment of AUD112,472.00 to the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
5	Ashok Kumar Giri v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Statutory Presumptions 02 Sep 2001 Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant)Lost	02 Sep 2001	Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.