Yeo Lai Hock

Yeo Lai Hock is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and winding up. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in injunctions and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Injunctions	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Lai Hock has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Lai Hock has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nine Yards Chambers LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Sw Chan Kit v Ntegrator Holdings Ltd: Winding Up Application Dispute(Jan 2025)
Solitaire LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project Dispute(Jul 2021)
JLC Advisors LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Tang Ying v Chen Mingliang: Mareva Injunction, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Lai Hock's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.2
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33%
Won	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2025	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Lai Hock's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	17,000.00	17,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sw Chan Kit v Ntegrator Holdings Ltd: Winding Up Application Dispute 27 Jan 2025 Ntegrator Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2025	Ntegrator Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Winding up order grantedThe court ordered Ntegrator Holdings Ltd to be wound up.
2	PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project Dispute 12 Jul 2021 Oxley Batam Pte Ltd(formerly known as Totality Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Applicant)Won	12 Jul 2021	Oxley Batam Pte Ltd(formerly known as Totality Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Applicant): Anti-suit injunction grantedAnti-suit injunction granted to restrain PT Karya Indo Batam from pursuing actions in Indonesia relating to the Batam Project. Fixed costs of S$17,000 awarded to OBPL, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tang Ying v Chen Mingliang: Mareva Injunction, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty 11 Oct 2018 Zhang Haibo (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Oct 2018	Zhang Haibo (Plaintiff): Injunction variedInjunction order granted against the Sound Property was lifted. In its place, the court granted the plaintiffs leave to lodge a caveat against the Sound Property.