Yeo Lih Wei

Yeo Lih Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and minority oppression. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Goods Sold and Delivered	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Lih Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Lih Wei has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	67% of cases	Hawley & Hazel v Szu Ming: Summary Judgment for Goods Sold, Parallel Imports & Distributorship Termination(Jan 2008) Brooks v Millar: Injunction for Share Cancellation & Share Register Rectification(Jun 2006)
Lee and Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Cheah Geok Tuan v Lie Khin Sin: Disguised Loan Agreement & Share Buyback Option Dispute(Nov 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Lih Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Lih Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,049,206.73	3,524,603.372 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hawley & Hazel v Szu Ming: Summary Judgment for Goods Sold, Parallel Imports & Distributorship Termination 27 Jan 2008 Szu Ming Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Jan 2008	Szu Ming Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and final judgment awarded to the plaintiff in the sum of $6,452,012.47 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ (9 March 2007) to the date of judgment (21 September 2007). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Brooks v Millar: Injunction for Share Cancellation & Share Register Rectification 25 Jun 2006 Brooks, Kenneth Williams (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jun 2006	Brooks, Kenneth Williams (Plaintiff): Prayer for rectification of share register dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's prayer for rectification of the share register.
3	Cheah Geok Tuan v Lie Khin Sin: Disguised Loan Agreement & Share Buyback Option Dispute 10 Nov 2005 Lie Turng Phung (Defendant)Lost	10 Nov 2005	Lie Turng Phung (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants must deliver up the share certificates in question to the second plaintiff upon payment of $298,597.13 by the plaintiffs. Costs are to follow the event, to be taxed if not agreed. (Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.)