Yeo Soo Mong Tony

Yeo Soo Mong Tony is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in guarantee and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and guarantee.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of confidentiality	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Privity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Soo Mong Tony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Soo Mong Tony has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Pontiac Land v P-Zone Services: Validity of Tenancy Agreements and Property Rights Dispute(Jun 2010) PT Jaya v Kristle: Guarantee, Indemnity & Limitation Act Dispute(May 2009) International Coal v Kristle Trading: Arbitration Confidentiality & Issue Estoppel(Oct 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Soo Mong Tony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.2 parties avg	4.2	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Soo Mong Tony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pontiac Land v P-Zone Services: Validity of Tenancy Agreements and Property Rights Dispute 01 Jun 2010 Pontiac Land Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Jun 2010	Pontiac Land Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar in relation to periods the defendant prevented rightful access to the Premises. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	PT Jaya v Kristle: Guarantee, Indemnity & Limitation Act Dispute 27 May 2009 Low Tuck Kwong (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	27 May 2009	Low Tuck Kwong (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	International Coal v Kristle Trading: Arbitration Confidentiality & Issue Estoppel 21 Oct 2008 PT Jaya Sumplies Indonesia (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Oct 2008	PT Jaya Sumplies Indonesia (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant.