Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn

Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of confidence and existence of debt. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Existence of debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cairnhill Law LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2025) Priscilla Lim v Amber Compounding: Breach of Confidence & Damages(May 2024) Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.4 parties avg	4.4	67%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 12 Feb 2025 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	12 Feb 2025	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, specifically regarding the Balance Work Counterclaim. The award was set aside insofar as it concerns the Balance Work Counterclaim.
2	Priscilla Lim v Amber Compounding: Breach of Confidence & Damages 19 May 2024 Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	19 May 2024	Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that the consent judgment limited the respondents' claim to damages for wrongful gain only.
3	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award 31 Jan 2024 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	31 Jan 2024	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed. Costs of S$15,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Amber Compounding Pharmacy v Lim Suk Ling: Breach of Confidence & Remedies 30 Aug 2023 Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Aug 2023	Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Successful in SummonsThe court held that a plaintiff is entitled to plead that it is proceeding on both the wrongful gain interest and the wrongful loss interest in a claim for breach of confidence and therefore claim for both damages under the Coco approach and equitable damages under the I-Admin approach.
5	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Stay of Adjudication Enforcement 26 Feb 2023 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2023	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent in the amount of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lazarus Century Construction v SLH Development: Debt Recovery Dispute 07 Nov 2022 Lazarus Century Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Nov 2022	Lazarus Century Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim that the defendant failed to repay a loan was dismissed. The garnished sum of $86,355.33 and the sum of $300 for bank charges are to be returned to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.