Yeoh Jean Ann

Yeoh Jean Ann is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in passing off and company law. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeoh Jean Ann has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	8 cases	100% of cases	Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness(Jul 2021) Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act(May 2021) Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Passing Off(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeoh Jean Ann's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 5 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	50%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	36.3 parties avg	6.3	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	45.4 parties avg	5.4
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeoh Jean Ann's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	387,000.00	77,400.005 cases	5
USD	39,196,887.76	39,196,887.761 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness 01 Jul 2021 Digi International Inc. (Appellant)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Digi International Inc. (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Intellectual Property Adjudicator’s decision was dismissed.
2	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Teck Chuan (Respondent, Defendant)Won	04 May 2021	Ong Teck Chuan (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal in the amount of $65,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Passing Off 18 Oct 2020 Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	18 Oct 2020	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd to pay costs of SGD 57,000 to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression, De Facto & Shadow Directors, Company Accounts 29 Jul 2020 Ong Teck Chuan (Defendant)Won	29 Jul 2020	Ong Teck Chuan (Defendant): Costs AwardedDefendant was awarded costs of SGD 230,000.00. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 23 Jun 2020 Wong Zhi Yang, Clement (Plaintiff)Won	23 Jun 2020	Wong Zhi Yang, Clement (Plaintiff): Application for worldwide Mareva injunction grantedApplication for worldwide Mareva injunction against the Defendants’ assets granted up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).
6	Lim Chong Poon v Chiang Sing Jeong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Trust Deed 29 Mar 2020 Lim Chong Poon (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Lim Chong Poon (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (all-in) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Passing Off 04 Nov 2019 Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	04 Nov 2019	Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim allowed in partClaim for breach of clause 12 of the Employment Agreement in respect of Timothy allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assume the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
8	Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute 28 Nov 2018 Low Kwang Tong (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2018	Low Kwang Tong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant is ordered to pay the respondents costs of $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).