Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent

Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in resulting trust and statutory illegality. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Dispute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal loan	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental incapacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Franchises and Franchising	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Malkin & Maxwell LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Loy Wei Ezekiel v Yip Holdings: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Dec 2022) Tay Yak Ping v Tay Nguang Kee Serene: Resulting Trusts & Family Property Dispute(May 2022) North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd v Yip Fook Meng: Illegality of Loan Guarantee under Moneylenders Act(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	29%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeoh Oon Weng Vincent's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	234,000.08	33,428.587 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Loy Wei Ezekiel v Yip Holdings: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 05 Dec 2022 Yip Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Dec 2022	Yip Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs of $24,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tay Yak Ping v Tay Nguang Kee Serene: Resulting Trusts & Family Property Dispute 22 May 2022 Tay Sia Yong (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	22 May 2022	Tay Sia Yong (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of SGD 45,000 to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd v Yip Fook Meng: Illegality of Loan Guarantee under Moneylenders Act 28 Nov 2021 Yip Fook Meng (Respondent, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Won	28 Nov 2021	Yip Fook Meng (Respondent, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Yip Fook Meng awarded $30,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tay Nguang Kee Serene v Tay Yak Ping: Resulting Trusts & Family Disputes 16 Aug 2021 Tay Yak Ping (Defendant)Partial	16 Aug 2021	Tay Yak Ping (Defendant): Partial JudgmentYak Ping is entitled to 3.93% of the Sum as a result of his CPF contribution of $23,600 towards the purchase price of the Pacific Mansion Property. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd v Megatrucare Pte Ltd: Illegality of Loan Guarantee & Mental Capacity 05 May 2021 Yip Fook Meng (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Won	05 May 2021	Yip Fook Meng (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim granted for a declaration that the Guarantee is unenforceable under section 14(2)(a) of the Moneylenders Act. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Yip Fook Chong v Loy Wei Ezekiel: Fiduciary Duty, Unjust Enrichment & Oral Agreement Dispute 27 Apr 2020 Yip Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Apr 2020	Yip Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims dismissedAll claims made by the plaintiff were dismissed.
7	D'Oz International v PSB Corp: Franchise Fee Refund Dispute Over Chinese Regulations 17 Mar 2010 D'Oz International Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	17 Mar 2010	D'Oz International Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedD'Oz is entitled to a refund of $120,000 with interest at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.