Yeow Tin Tin Margaret

Yeow Tin Tin Margaret is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and resulting trusts. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Debt Repayment Scheme	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Advancement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeow Tin Tin Margaret has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	K Shanker Kumar v Nedumaran Muthukrishnan: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order(Aug 2023) TZQ v TZR: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance in Divorce(Jan 2019) BUE v TZQ: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Advancement in HDB Property Dispute(Dec 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeow Tin Tin Margaret's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeow Tin Tin Margaret's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	K Shanker Kumar v Nedumaran Muthukrishnan: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order 02 Aug 2023 K Shanker Kumar (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	02 Aug 2023	K Shanker Kumar (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, setting aside the bankruptcy order against the appellant. The respondent's claim was not successful.
2	TZQ v TZR: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance in Divorce 17 Jan 2019 TZQ (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	17 Jan 2019	TZQ (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the court varied the maintenance amount and ordered the sale of the matrimonial flat. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	BUE v TZQ: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Advancement in HDB Property Dispute 27 Dec 2018 TZQ (Defendant)Partial	27 Dec 2018	TZQ (Defendant): PartialThe court found that the defendant had an 87.80% beneficial interest in the property.