Yeow Ying Xin Madeline

Yeow Ying Xin Madeline is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in evidence and child custody. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence and child custody.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Video Link	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeow Ying Xin Madeline has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee: Video Link Evidence & Witness Testimony(Mar 2022) Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng: Contempt of Court for Failure to Account for Sales Proceeds(Dec 2021) VPG v VPF: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Relocation Dispute(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeow Ying Xin Madeline's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeow Ying Xin Madeline's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,700,000.00	30,700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee: Video Link Evidence & Witness Testimony 10 Mar 2022 Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Mar 2022	Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for leave to give evidence via video link was dismissed.
2	Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng: Contempt of Court for Failure to Account for Sales Proceeds 05 Dec 2021 Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff)Won	05 Dec 2021	Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the main action; Dr Goh ordered to repay S$30.7m. (Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	VPG v VPF: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Relocation Dispute 27 Jun 2021 VPG (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	27 Jun 2021	VPG (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision refusing leave for the Father to relocate the child to India was dismissed.