Yip Shuen Kai Harren

Yip Shuen Kai Harren is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and geographical indications. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in intellectual property law and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Geographical indications	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Qualification of rights	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Translation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yip Shuen Kai Harren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yip Shuen Kai Harren has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravindran Associates LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Fonterra Brands v Consorzio: Parmesan as Translation of Parmigiano Reggiano(Nov 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yip Shuen Kai Harren's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yip Shuen Kai Harren's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fonterra Brands v Consorzio: Parmesan as Translation of Parmigiano Reggiano 21 Nov 2024 Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	21 Nov 2024	Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the protection of the geographical indication “PARMIGIANO REGGIANO” should not extend to the use of the term “Parmesan”. Costs of S$100,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Consorzio to Fonterra. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.