Yu Kexin

Yu Kexin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and director's duties. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yu Kexin has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Holding out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yu Kexin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yu Kexin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yu Law	7 cases	70% of cases	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice(Jan 2025) CXG v CXI: Enforcing Interim Measures in Singapore-Seated Arbitration(Sep 2023) Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd v Pawan Kumar Jagetia: Breach of Employment Contract & Implied Terms(Aug 2023)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	30% of cases	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions(Jan 2018) Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims(Apr 2017) Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty(Mar 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yu Kexin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 5 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	40%
Partial	44.5 parties avg	4.5	40%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yu Kexin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Partial	4(40%)	40%
Won	2(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,100,000.00	442,857.147 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 09 Jan 2025 Glassberg, Jonathan William (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jan 2025	Glassberg, Jonathan William (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages of US$2,500,000 or damages to be assessed, as well as interest and costs, fails. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	CXG v CXI: Enforcing Interim Measures in Singapore-Seated Arbitration 11 Sep 2023 CXH (Claimant)Won	11 Sep 2023	CXH (Claimant): Application allowedThe court found that forum non conveniens principles do not apply to the enforcement of domestic interim measures and dismissed the Stay Applications with costs.
3	Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd v Pawan Kumar Jagetia: Breach of Employment Contract & Implied Terms 23 Aug 2023 Pawan Kumar Jagetia (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	23 Aug 2023	Pawan Kumar Jagetia (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; Mr. Jagetia is entitled to retain his three months’ salary in lieu of notice. Mr Jagetia is not entitled to retain the Repatriation Allowance of S$5,000 as compensation for wrongful termination given our conclusion that he did not relocate to Singapore with his family in the first place.
4	Glassberg v UBS AG: Striking Out Claims for Losses in Direct Lending Income Fund 14 Dec 2022 Jonathan William Glassberg (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	14 Dec 2022	Jonathan William Glassberg (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, striking out the plaintiff’s claim in so far as it was premised on the defendant’s breach of contract. The plaintiff’s remaining claim in tort was not obviously unsustainable and the threshold for striking out had not been met.
5	CIP v CIQ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award - Setting Aside - Mining Joint Venture Dispute 18 Nov 2021 CIP (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	18 Nov 2021	CIP (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedCIP's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
6	Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd: Conflict of Laws & Jurisdiction in Fraud Claim 30 Dec 2020 Ben Yitzhak Zur (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2020	Ben Yitzhak Zur (Defendant): Application GrantedDefendant's application granted; court declared it lacked jurisdiction over the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tan Wai Luen v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault by Penetration & Sentencing Principles 02 Dec 2020 Tan Wai Luen (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2020	Tan Wai Luen (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
8	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	16 Jan 2018	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims 24 Apr 2017 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Apr 2017	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff): Partial SuccessThe plaintiff was awarded party and party costs of $600,000, with the defendants liable for varying percentages. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty 30 Mar 2016 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2016	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff): Application for leave to amend the statement of claim was disallowedPlaintiff's application for leave to amend the statement of claim by adding Paragraphs 42A and 42C was disallowed.