Zaminder Gill

Zaminder Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and undue influence. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zaminder Gill has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Letters of Administration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Zaminder Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zaminder Gill has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hilborne & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Vellasamy Lakshimi v Muthusamy Suppiah David: Fraud and Undue Influence in Property Transfer(Mar 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zaminder Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zaminder Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vellasamy Lakshimi v Muthusamy Suppiah David: Fraud and Undue Influence in Property Transfer 31 Mar 2003 Muthusamy Suppiah David (Defendant)Won	31 Mar 2003	Muthusamy Suppiah David (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.