Zeng Hanyi

Zeng Hanyi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and construction law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in injunctions and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Injunctions	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Valuation of materials	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Zeng Hanyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zeng Hanyi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Focus Law Asia LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction(Oct 2023) Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information(Apr 2022)
Characterist LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Chuang Long Engineering v Nan Huat Aluminium: Security of Payment Act & Valuation of Materials(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zeng Hanyi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zeng Hanyi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	8,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction 03 Oct 2023 Oshima Yumiko (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2023	Oshima Yumiko (Respondent): Application DismissedCommittal application against the 3rd and 4th respondents was dismissed. Costs in the sum of $4,000 each, plus reasonable disbursements, were awarded to the 3rd and 4th defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information 17 Apr 2022 Afeli Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	17 Apr 2022	Afeli Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to discharge injunction partially allowedThe defendant's application to discharge the non-solicitation injunctions and the confidentiality injunctions was dismissed. The defendant was allowed to vary paragraphs 1(b), 2(a) and 3(b) of the Injunction Order to limit the duration of the non-solicitation injunction to six months, and to make their proposed amendments to paragraphs 2(b) and 3(a) of the Injunction Order to limit the scope of the confidentiality injunctions.
3	Chuang Long Engineering v Nan Huat Aluminium: Security of Payment Act & Valuation of Materials 04 Mar 2019 Chuang Long Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	04 Mar 2019	Chuang Long Engineering Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the Adjudication Determination was dismissed.