Zeslene Mao Huijing

Zeslene Mao Huijing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and winding up.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zeslene Mao Huijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zeslene Mao Huijing has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Mercantile & Maritime Investments Pte Ltd v Iceberg Energy Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Arbitration Stay(Mar 2022) Rahmat Bin Karimon v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act after Gobi Decision(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zeslene Mao Huijing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zeslene Mao Huijing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mercantile & Maritime Investments Pte Ltd v Iceberg Energy Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Arbitration Stay 24 Mar 2022 Mercantile & Maritime Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Mar 2022	Mercantile & Maritime Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedWinding-up application dismissed; both parties to bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Rahmat Bin Karimon v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act after Gobi Decision 04 Aug 2021 Rahmat Bin Karimon (Applicant)Lost	04 Aug 2021	Rahmat Bin Karimon (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed.