Zhao Liwen Constance

Zhao Liwen Constance is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zhao Liwen Constance has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zhao Liwen Constance has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	CIFG v Polimet: Interpretation of Indemnity Clause in Convertible Bond Agreements(Feb 2017) Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zhao Liwen Constance's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zhao Liwen Constance's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	66,838,374.08	66,838,374.081 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CIFG v Polimet: Interpretation of Indemnity Clause in Convertible Bond Agreements 07 Feb 2017 Yeo Kar Peng (Third party)Neutral	07 Feb 2017	Yeo Kar Peng (Third party): Third party claim dismissedThe third party claim against Yeo Kar Peng is dismissed.
2	Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision 19 Nov 2014 Bank of China Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff)Won	19 Nov 2014	Bank of China Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for US$66,838,374.08 together with further contractual interest. Assumed USD, as the loan was in USD.