Zoe Pittas

Zoe Pittas is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in summary judgement and civil practice. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zoe Pittas has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and striking out.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Diagnosis	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Hospital Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zoe Pittas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zoe Pittas has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment on Guarantee & Striking Out Counterclaim(Apr 2019) CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment & Striking Out in Guarantee Claim(Apr 2019) Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Delayed Lung Cancer Diagnosis(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zoe Pittas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zoe Pittas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	62,347,397.06	62,347,397.061 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment & Striking Out in Guarantee Claim 28 Apr 2019 CRRC HongKong Capital Management Co Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	28 Apr 2019	CRRC HongKong Capital Management Co Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim Struck OutCounterclaim against CRRC HongKong Capital Management Co Limited was struck out.
2	CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment on Guarantee & Striking Out Counterclaim 28 Apr 2019 Guo BingQiang (Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	28 Apr 2019	Guo BingQiang (Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim struck outCounterclaim against Guo BingQiang struck out.
3	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Delayed Lung Cancer Diagnosis 25 Feb 2019 Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Respondent, Defendant)Won	25 Feb 2019	Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed against Soh Wei Wen Jason.