Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim

Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and winding up.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Securities Trading	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Trading & Conclusive Evidence Clauses(Jul 2014)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	50% of cases	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act(Jun 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zulkarnain Abdul Rahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Trading & Conclusive Evidence Clauses 28 Jul 2014 AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jul 2014	AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Application for summary judgment dismissedThe Plaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed.
2	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act 19 Jun 2007 Lau Yu Man (Applicant)Neutral	19 Jun 2007	Lau Yu Man (Applicant): Application adjournedApplication for winding up adjourned with liberty to apply for a winding up order after 5 June 2007 if the Company fails to rectify the breaches or fails to comply with the Companies Act; costs of the winding up application reserved.