AQQ
AQQ is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
AQQ has been represented by 1 law firm and 7 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Drew & Napier LLC | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of AQQ's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of AQQ's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(50.0%) |
| Won | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
25 Feb 2014 | Respondent, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed in part. The Additional Assessments for YA 2004, YA 2005 and YA 2006 were ultra vires. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
17 Dec 2012 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed. The Comptroller did not exercise his powers under s 33(1) fairly and reasonably when he disregarded both the dividend income and the interest expenses. The Comptroller should not have disregarded the dividend income and should have allowed a portion of the interest expenses while requiring the appellant to account for withholding tax. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |